The Estuary
The ground under it was tendered in 2008. Both ends of that are public; nobody puts them together.
The land under The Estuary
HDB put this parcel out to tender and names The Estuary as what was built on it. Everything below is from that tender: the dates, the winning price, and the 5 bids that came in.
- Tender launched30 Jan 2008
- Tender closed25 Mar 20085 bids received
- Awarded28 Mar 2008MCL Land (Warren) Pte Ltd
- Winning tenderS$213,500,000at least S$3,773 per sq m of gross floor area · at least S$350 per sq ft
- Parcel
- Yishun S2 Yishun Avenue 1 / Yishun Avenue 2
- Site area
- 26,949 sq m
- Lease
- 99 yrs
- Plot ratio
- 2.1
- Gross floor area
- 56,593 sq m (max)
- Sold as
- Condominium
HDB marks this gross floor area as a maximum, so it is the most that could be built and not what was built. The rate above is therefore the lowest the land can have cost per square foot, not the rate itself.
Every bid — all 5, as HDB published them
| # | Tenderer | Bid | Behind the winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MCL Land (Warren) Pte Ltd | S$213,500,000 | — |
| 2 | Peak Green Pte. Ltd. | S$127,000,000 | S$86,500,000 · 40.5% |
| 3 | Frasers Centrepoint Limit | S$109,660,000 | S$103,840,000 · 48.6% |
| 4 | Sim Lian Land Pte Ltd | S$92,595,000 | S$120,905,000 · 56.6% |
| 5 | Billion Rise Limited | S$57,740,000 | S$155,760,000 · 73.0% |
What the land cost and what a unit sells for are not two ends of one sum. Between them sit construction over a multi-year build, financing, the development charge, marketing and agent commissions, GST, and the cost of holding unsold units. None of those is published for a named project, so this site does not estimate a developer’s cost or margin and no figure here should be read as one.
Source: HDB — Sites Sold by HDB · tender awarded 28 Mar 2008 · transcribed from HDB’s published tables on 2026-08-31 · prices are nominal and are not adjusted for inflation. HDB names the development on this row as “The Estuary”. This parcel, from tender to today · Every land sale
What has been filed there since
Those two are not the same square foot. Gross floor area includes what nobody buys — the corridors, the car park, the plant rooms — so the land rate is spread across more area than a unit is sold by. The ratio is arithmetic on two published figures and is not a return, a profit, or an appreciation.
Year by year, every size at this address
| Year | Median psf | Against the year before |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | $1,048 (16) | — |
| 2022 | $1,102 (29) | +5.2% |
| 2023 | $1,188 (25) | +7.8% |
| 2024 | $1,295 (34) | +9.0% |
| 2025 | $1,301 (14) | +0.5% |
| 2026 | $1,309 (9) | +0.6% |
The two ends of this page are not two ends of one sum. Between the tender and the first unit sold sit construction over a multi-year build, financing, the development charge, marketing and agent commissions, GST, and the cost of holding unsold stock. None of those is published for a named project, so nothing here estimates a developer’s cost or margin and no figure on this page should be read as one. Why that is refused.
The rest of it
- Every filed transaction at The EstuaryThe full record — price history, floor premium, what a sale would net
- Every land sale since 1993441 URA sites and 216 from HDB, with every losing bid that was published
- Why there is no margin on this pageWhat sits between the two ends, and why none of it is published