Arc at Tampines
The ground under it was tendered in 2010. Both ends of that are public; nobody puts them together.
The land under Arc at Tampines
HDB put this parcel out to tender and names Arc at Tampines as what was built on it. Everything below is from that tender: the dates, the winning price, and the 6 bids that came in.
- Tender launched6 Oct 2010
- Tender closed23 Nov 20106 bids received
- Awarded25 Nov 2010Hoi Hup Realty Pte Ltd, Sunway Developments Pte Ltd and SC Wong Holdings Pte Ltd
- Winning tenderS$187,590,000S$3,252 per sq m of gross floor area · S$302 per sq ft
- Parcel
- Tampines E9 Tampines Avenue 8
- Site area
- 20,600 sq m
- Lease
- 99 yrs
- Plot ratio
- 2.8
- Gross floor area
- 57,680 sq m
- Sold as
- EC
Every bid — all 6, as HDB published them
| # | Tenderer | Bid | Behind the winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hoi Hup Realty Pte Ltd, Sunway Developments Pte Ltd & SC Wong Holdings Pte Ltd | S$187,590,000 | — |
| 2 | Opal Star Pte Ltd & Lum Chang Building Contractors Pte Ltd | S$172,800,000 | S$14,790,000 · 7.9% |
| 3 | Grand Isle Holdings Pte. Ltd. | S$161,500,000 | S$26,090,000 · 13.9% |
| 4 | EL Development Pte Ltd | S$148,200,000 | S$39,390,000 · 21.0% |
| 5 | NTUC Choice Homes Co-operative Limited | S$147,900,000 | S$39,690,000 · 21.2% |
| 6 | Sim Lian Land Pte Ltd | S$141,682,000 | S$45,908,000 · 24.5% |
What the land cost and what a unit sells for are not two ends of one sum. Between them sit construction over a multi-year build, financing, the development charge, marketing and agent commissions, GST, and the cost of holding unsold units. None of those is published for a named project, so this site does not estimate a developer’s cost or margin and no figure here should be read as one.
Source: HDB — Sites Sold by HDB · tender awarded 25 Nov 2010 · transcribed from HDB’s published tables on 2026-08-31 · prices are nominal and are not adjusted for inflation. HDB names the development on this row as “Arc @Tampines”. This parcel, from tender to today · Every land sale
What has been filed there since
Those two are not the same square foot. Gross floor area includes what nobody buys — the corridors, the car park, the plant rooms — so the land rate is spread across more area than a unit is sold by. The ratio is arithmetic on two published figures and is not a return, a profit, or an appreciation.
Year by year, for a median-sized unit
| Year | Median psf | Against the year before |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | $995 (3) | — |
| 2022 | $1,073 (4) | +7.8% |
| 2023 | $1,138 (1) | +6.1% |
| 2024 | $1,345 (9) | +18.2% |
| 2025 | $1,309 (5) | -2.7% |
| 2026 | $1,456 (1) | +11.2% |
The two ends of this page are not two ends of one sum. Between the tender and the first unit sold sit construction over a multi-year build, financing, the development charge, marketing and agent commissions, GST, and the cost of holding unsold stock. None of those is published for a named project, so nothing here estimates a developer’s cost or margin and no figure on this page should be read as one. Why that is refused.
The rest of it
- Every filed transaction at Arc at TampinesThe full record — price history, floor premium, what a sale would net
- Every land sale since 1993441 URA sites and 216 from HDB, with every losing bid that was published
- Why there is no margin on this pageWhat sits between the two ends, and why none of it is published