Citylife@tampines
The ground under it was tendered in 2012. Both ends of that are public; nobody puts them together.
The land under Citylife@tampines
HDB put this parcel out to tender and names Citylife@tampines as what was built on it. Everything below is from that tender: the dates, the winning price, and the 6 bids that came in.
- Tender launched15 Mar 2012
- Tender closed10 May 20126 bids received
- Awarded14 May 2012Singxpress Property Development Pte Ltd, Creative Investments Pte Ltd and Kay Lim Realty Pte Ltd
- Winning tenderS$233,525,655S$4,019 per sq m of gross floor area · S$373 per sq ft
- Parcel
- Tampines E11 Tampines Central 7 / Tampines Avenue 7 / Tampines Avenue 9
- Site area
- 20,751 sq m
- Lease
- 99 yrs
- Plot ratio
- 2.8
- Gross floor area
- 58,101 sq m
- Sold as
- EC
Every bid — all 6, as HDB published them
| # | Tenderer | Bid | Behind the winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Singxpress Property Development Pte Ltd, Creative Investments Pte Ltd and Kay Lim Realty Pte Ltd | S$233,525,655 | — |
| 2 | Maxdin Pte Ltd & BPK Development Pte Ltd & United Infrastructure Pte Ltd & LMG Realty Pte Ltd | S$230,700,000 | S$2,825,655 · 1.2% |
| 3 | Sim Lian Land Pte Ltd | S$222,288,000 | S$11,237,655 · 4.8% |
| 4 | EL Development Pte Ltd | S$220,100,000 | S$13,425,655 · 5.7% |
| 5 | White Haven Properties Pte. Ltd. | S$220,000,000 | S$13,525,655 · 5.8% |
| 6 | MCL Land Limited | S$215,500,000 | S$18,025,655 · 7.7% |
What the land cost and what a unit sells for are not two ends of one sum. Between them sit construction over a multi-year build, financing, the development charge, marketing and agent commissions, GST, and the cost of holding unsold units. None of those is published for a named project, so this site does not estimate a developer’s cost or margin and no figure here should be read as one.
Source: HDB — Sites Sold by HDB · tender awarded 14 May 2012 · transcribed from HDB’s published tables on 2026-08-31 · prices are nominal and are not adjusted for inflation. HDB names the development on this row as “CityLife@Tampines”. This parcel, from tender to today · Every land sale
What has been filed there since
Those two are not the same square foot. Gross floor area includes what nobody buys — the corridors, the car park, the plant rooms — so the land rate is spread across more area than a unit is sold by. The ratio is arithmetic on two published figures and is not a return, a profit, or an appreciation.
Year by year, for a median-sized unit
| Year | Median psf | Against the year before |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | $1,153 (4) | — |
| 2022 | $1,225 (11) | +6.2% |
| 2023 | $1,234 (4) | +0.7% |
| 2024 | $1,452 (9) | +17.7% |
| 2025 | $1,624 (6) | +11.8% |
| 2026 | $1,611 (4) | -0.8% |
The two ends of this page are not two ends of one sum. Between the tender and the first unit sold sit construction over a multi-year build, financing, the development charge, marketing and agent commissions, GST, and the cost of holding unsold stock. None of those is published for a named project, so nothing here estimates a developer’s cost or margin and no figure on this page should be read as one. Why that is refused.
The rest of it
- Every filed transaction at Citylife@tampinesThe full record — price history, floor premium, what a sale would net
- Every land sale since 1993441 URA sites and 216 from HDB, with every losing bid that was published
- Why there is no margin on this pageWhat sits between the two ends, and why none of it is published