Watercolours
The ground under it was tendered in 2011. Both ends of that are public; nobody puts them together.
The land under Watercolours
HDB put this parcel out to tender and names Watercolours as what was built on it. Everything below is from that tender: the dates, the winning price, and the 11 bids that came in.
- Tender launched25 Aug 2011
- Tender closed11 Oct 201111 bids received
- Awarded12 Oct 2011Ho Lee Group Pte Ltd & Maxdin Pte Ltd
- Winning tenderS$122,200,000S$3,133 per sq m of gross floor area · S$291 per sq ft
- Parcel
- Pasir Ris E9 Pasir Ris Drive 3/ Pasir Ris Link
- Site area
- 18,576 sq m
- Lease
- 99 yrs
- Plot ratio
- 2.1
- Gross floor area
- 39,010 sq m
- Sold as
- EC
Every bid — all 11, as HDB published them
| # | Tenderer | Bid | Behind the winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ho Lee Group Pte Ltd & Maxdin Pte Ltd | S$122,200,000 | — |
| 2 | CEL Development Pte Ltd | S$118,838,828 | S$3,361,172 · 2.8% |
| 3 | Peak Shines Pte. Ltd. | S$113,900,000 | S$8,300,000 · 6.8% |
| 4 | Hangzhou Headway Real Estate Co., Ltd & L Gold Pte Ltd | S$113,860,066 | S$8,339,934 · 6.8% |
| 5 | Sunmaster Holdings Pte. Ltd. | S$113,380,000 | S$8,820,000 · 7.2% |
| 6 | Qingjian Realty (South Pacific) Group Pte Ltd | S$112,370,000 | S$9,830,000 · 8.0% |
| 7 | Realty Consortium Pte. Ltd. | S$111,900,000 | S$10,300,000 · 8.4% |
| 8 | Frasers Centrepoint Limited | S$100,980,000 | S$21,220,000 · 17.4% |
| 9 | EL Development Pte Ltd | S$100,889,000 | S$21,311,000 · 17.4% |
| 10 | Hoi Hup Realty Pte Ltd and Sunway Developments Pte Ltd | S$98,760,000 | S$23,440,000 · 19.2% |
| 11 | Wee Hur Development Pte Ltd | S$90,000,000 | S$32,200,000 · 26.4% |
What the land cost and what a unit sells for are not two ends of one sum. Between them sit construction over a multi-year build, financing, the development charge, marketing and agent commissions, GST, and the cost of holding unsold units. None of those is published for a named project, so this site does not estimate a developer’s cost or margin and no figure here should be read as one.
Source: HDB — Sites Sold by HDB · tender awarded 12 Oct 2011 · transcribed from HDB’s published tables on 2026-08-31 · prices are nominal and are not adjusted for inflation. HDB names the development on this row as “Watercolours”. This parcel, from tender to today · Every land sale
What has been filed there since
Those two are not the same square foot. Gross floor area includes what nobody buys — the corridors, the car park, the plant rooms — so the land rate is spread across more area than a unit is sold by. The ratio is arithmetic on two published figures and is not a return, a profit, or an appreciation.
Year by year, for a median-sized unit
| Year | Median psf | Against the year before |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | $868 (2) | — |
| 2022 | $1,022 (5) | +17.7% |
| 2023 | $1,010 (2) | -1.2% |
| 2024 | $1,218 (5) | +20.6% |
| 2025 | $1,259 (5) | +3.4% |
| 2026 | $774 (2) | -38.5% |
The two ends of this page are not two ends of one sum. Between the tender and the first unit sold sit construction over a multi-year build, financing, the development charge, marketing and agent commissions, GST, and the cost of holding unsold stock. None of those is published for a named project, so nothing here estimates a developer’s cost or margin and no figure on this page should be read as one. Why that is refused.
The rest of it
- Every filed transaction at WatercoloursThe full record — price history, floor premium, what a sale would net
- Every land sale since 1993441 URA sites and 216 from HDB, with every losing bid that was published
- Why there is no margin on this pageWhat sits between the two ends, and why none of it is published