Thomson Three
The ground under it was tendered in 2012. Both ends of that are public; nobody puts them together.
The land under Thomson Three
HDB put this parcel out to tender and names Thomson Three as what was built on it. Everything below is from that tender: the dates, the winning price, and the 6 bids that came in.
- Tender launched20 Jun 2012
- Tender closed7 Aug 20126 bids received
- Awarded10 Aug 2012UVD Pte. Ltd.
- Winning tenderS$291,500,000S$7,748 per sq m of gross floor area · S$720 per sq ft
- Parcel
- Bishan S8 Bright Hill Drive
- Site area
- 13,437 sq m
- Lease
- 99 yrs
- Plot ratio
- 2.8
- Gross floor area
- 37,624 sq m
- Sold as
- Condominium
Every bid — all 6, as HDB published them
| # | Tenderer | Bid | Behind the winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | UVD Pte. Ltd. | S$291,500,000 | — |
| 2 | FCL Topaz Pte. Ltd., Far East Orchard Limited and Seikisui House, Ltd. | S$246,800,000 | S$44,700,000 · 15.3% |
| 3 | Qingjiang Realty (South Pacific) Group Pte Ltd | S$245,870,000 | S$45,630,000 · 15.7% |
| 4 | Verspring Properties Pte. Ltd. | S$243,000,000 | S$48,500,000 · 16.6% |
| 5 | Hoi Hup Realty Pte Ltd, Sunway Developments Pte Ltd and Hoi Hup J.V. Development Pte Ltd | S$230,870,000 | S$60,630,000 · 20.8% |
| 6 | Wee Hur Development Pte Ltd | S$206,200,000 | S$85,300,000 · 29.3% |
What the land cost and what a unit sells for are not two ends of one sum. Between them sit construction over a multi-year build, financing, the development charge, marketing and agent commissions, GST, and the cost of holding unsold units. None of those is published for a named project, so this site does not estimate a developer’s cost or margin and no figure here should be read as one.
Source: HDB — Sites Sold by HDB · tender awarded 10 Aug 2012 · transcribed from HDB’s published tables on 2026-08-31 · prices are nominal and are not adjusted for inflation. HDB names the development on this row as “Thomson Three”. This parcel, from tender to today · Every land sale
What has been filed there since
Those two are not the same square foot. Gross floor area includes what nobody buys — the corridors, the car park, the plant rooms — so the land rate is spread across more area than a unit is sold by. The ratio is arithmetic on two published figures and is not a return, a profit, or an appreciation.
Year by year, every size at this address
| Year | Median psf | Against the year before |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | $1,708 (14) | — |
| 2022 | $1,735 (33) | +1.6% |
| 2023 | $1,926 (29) | +11.0% |
| 2024 | $2,022 (22) | +5.0% |
| 2025 | $2,063 (21) | +2.0% |
| 2026 | $2,165 (18) | +4.9% |
The two ends of this page are not two ends of one sum. Between the tender and the first unit sold sit construction over a multi-year build, financing, the development charge, marketing and agent commissions, GST, and the cost of holding unsold stock. None of those is published for a named project, so nothing here estimates a developer’s cost or margin and no figure on this page should be read as one. Why that is refused.
The rest of it
- Every filed transaction at Thomson ThreeThe full record — price history, floor premium, what a sale would net
- Every land sale since 1993441 URA sites and 216 from HDB, with every losing bid that was published
- Why there is no margin on this pageWhat sits between the two ends, and why none of it is published